|
How low can they go? |
|
Hertzsprung (16:41 14/11/2002) Phlamethrower (17:40 14/11/2002) Phlamethrower (21:46 14/11/2002) Phlamethrower (21:50 14/11/2002) monkeyson2 (16:46 18/11/2002) takkaria (17:09 18/11/2002) monkeyson2 (10:15 19/11/2002) thegman (12:54 19/11/2002) andypoole (14:22 19/11/2002) guestx (16:32 19/11/2002) waveydaveclare (18:15 20/11/2002) moss (21:46 20/11/2002) guestx (11:45 21/11/2002) Rob Kendrick (15:42 21/11/2002) Gulli (20:34 21/11/2002) guestx (11:21 22/11/2002)
|
|
James Shaw |
Message #91441, posted by Hertzsprung at 16:41, 14/11/2002 |
Ghost-like
Posts: 1746
|
Do you think this is in response to the news of RISC OS 5 on the Iyonix? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #91442, posted by Phlamethrower at 17:40, 14/11/2002, in reply to message #91441 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
Perhaps, but working with castle to produce RISC OS 4/5 Select would probably help them more. Apart from all the gnarly licenseing issues though :( |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #91443, posted by Phlamethrower at 21:46, 14/11/2002, in reply to message #91442 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
<off topic> Bleh, first TIB goes down and now the forums are broke :( </off topic> |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #91444, posted by Phlamethrower at 21:50, 14/11/2002, in reply to message #91443 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
<off topic> Yay! Working again! </off topic> |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #91445, posted by monkeyson2 at 16:46, 18/11/2002, in reply to message #91444 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
Are they putting RO4 or Select into these ROMs? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Andrew Sidwell |
Message #91446, posted by takkaria at 17:09, 18/11/2002, in reply to message #91445 |
Member
Posts: 324
|
RISC OS 4. Read the article. andy/takka. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #91447, posted by monkeyson2 at 10:15, 19/11/2002, in reply to message #91446 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
Well, I know, but I was trying to start a discussion. The point is that vanilla RO4 is what, three years old now, and RISC OS Ltd are burning it into more chips when there is a newer version of the OS available? I thought the Select scheme was partly a cunning way of getting rid of the RO4 chip stocks - surely they should ship Select (1) now? Or provide the option to get it in ROM? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
thegman |
Message #91448, posted at 12:54, 19/11/2002, in reply to message #91447 |
Unregistered user
|
I agree, to ship an old version of an OS as a way to sell Select is pretty lame, however if you compare the price of RISC OS 4 to a brand new copy of Mac OS X or WinXP, RO4 is actually a pretty good deal anyway. Also, ROL have to make a buck somewhere, and with RO5 on the way, revenues are going to be slim for anyone trying to shift RO4, and I doubt Select on RO5 will do well (if it appears), after shelling out what will likely be £1000+ on an Iyonix, more on a monitor to do the graphics justice, not many people will be gasping to spend another £100 getting what amounts to a 'Plus Pack'. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #91449, posted by andypoole at 14:22, 19/11/2002, in reply to message #91448 |
Posts: 5558
|
If they already own a select subscription from a RiscPC or whatever, surely they could just swap it over to an Iyonix? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
GuestX |
Message #91450, posted by guestx at 16:32, 19/11/2002, in reply to message #91449 |
Member
Posts: 102
|
The wonders of proprietary software combined with the joys of 'rsing around inside your computer's case! |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
waveydaveclare |
Message #91451, posted at 18:15, 20/11/2002, in reply to message #91450 |
Unregistered user
|
Bargain for a largely 2 year old OS. Just try and hold me back from buying it, so I can be roped into a subscription scheme for future minor upgrades! Flogging... Horse... Dead... |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
John Hoare |
Message #91452, posted by moss at 21:46, 20/11/2002, in reply to message #91451 |
Posts: 9348
|
Just out of interest, are either of you more hopeful about RO5? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
GuestX |
Message #91453, posted by guestx at 11:45, 21/11/2002, in reply to message #91452 |
Member
Posts: 102
|
I'd be more interested to know if anyone has Linux running on Iyonix. Actually, that could have been the first operating system they had running. RISC OS 5 could have been great in 1995, but it's not entirely compelling now, is it? |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Rob Kendrick |
Message #91454, posted at 15:42, 21/11/2002, in reply to message #91453 |
Unregistered user
|
Not a lot of point trying to get Linux going on it - Linux already runs just fine on most XScale and ARM dev boards. Not to mention getting much more boom for your buck by running Linux on pretty much any other CPU you could shake a stick at. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
Gunnlaugur Jonsson |
Message #91455, posted by Gulli at 20:34, 21/11/2002, in reply to message #91454 |
Member
Posts: 138
|
Why on earth would you want to buy an Iyonix to run Linux on it??? Seems like spending a lot of money just to run an OS available on other much cheaper and more powerful hardware?!?! Iyonix should be good for running RISC OS but Linux - get a i386 compatible for probably half the price. To stay on topic for just a while: If RO Ltd. is still going to be putting RO 4.0x on the ROMS maybe people should wait to see if Castle will be offering RO 5 as an upgrade. |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
GuestX |
Message #91456, posted by guestx at 11:21, 22/11/2002, in reply to message #91455 |
Member
Posts: 102
|
Well, there's clearly little point in buying an Iyonix given the price/performance of available x86-compatible hardware, but surely there would be some "hack value" involved in running Linux on it, and the availability of Linux would at least give RISC OS users a possible upgrade path to a real operating system. ;-) |
|
[ Log in to reply ] |
|
|