Forums

Username:

Password:

User accounts

Register new account
Forgot password

Forum stats

List of members

Search the forums


Advanced search

Recent discussions

- Elsear brings super-fast Networking to Risc PC/A7000/A7000+ (News:)
- Latest hardware upgrade from RISCOSbits (News:)
- Accessing old floppy disks (Gen:3)
- November developer 'fireside' chat on saturday night (News:)
- RISCOSbits releases a new laptop solution (News:4)
- Announcing the TIB 2024 Advent Calendar (News:2)
- RISC OS London Show Report 2024 (News:1)
- Code GCC produces that makes you cry #12684 (Prog:39)
- Rougol November 2024 meeting on monday (News:)
- Drag'n'Drop 14i1 edition reviewed (News:)

Latest postings RSS Feeds

RSS 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.9
Atom 0.3
Misc RDF | CDF
 
View on Mastodon
@www.iconbar.com@rss-parrot.net

Site Search

 
Article archives
The Icon Bar: General: laptop & xscale
 
  laptop & xscale
  (15:22 19/1/2001)
  ams (21:07 19/1/2001)
    jess (15:12 20/1/2001)
      ams (19:23 23/1/2001)
        mfrissen (07:52 24/1/2001)
          ams (20:10 25/1/2001)
 
mfrissen Message #609, posted at 15:22, 19/1/2001
Unregistered user I was wondering: has _anyone_ heard _anything_ about the RS laptop?
Also, considering it is 'just' 56MHz, how well would it perform w/ROS4.03? I have a SA myself, and it's very responsive (with 64M it certainly blows away my 233MHz P-II machine running w98&64M)
I haven't tried running w/o the SA...
I am still doubting about getting a laptop or the omega.... the laptop to show off ROS at work (provided - which is why I'm doubting - the 56MHz CPU is fast enough to impress others [of course I'm not speaking about the text '56MHz' .. :-)], and fast enough to do some photomanip. stuff with...), the omega because it has the xscale support (how are they going to support it btw? - they claim with a slot like the SA in the old RPC, but do they have a sample ready? better yet.. are they in production ?)

[Edited by mfrissen at 15:24, 19/1/2001]
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
ams Message #610, posted at 21:07, 19/1/2001, in reply to message #609
Unregistered user As far as I know both Microdigital and Millipede are producing xScale (Intel i80200) upgrades. Attaching them to the motherboard via a daughterboard and slot is the way to go. Bear in mind xScale uses a 64 bit rather than 32 bit bus so unless the motherboard has inherent support the processor daughterboard may need multiplexing/demux circuitry to do the translations between 32 and 64 bit. The Imago has reprogrammable logic so should be quicker to "adjust" to take xScale - but even at that the task is not a trivial one.

The issue is one of software compatibility, xScale has no 26 bit mode, so is not (yet) RiscOS compatible. The best MD and Millipede can do is make sure their boards are electrically and physically able to take the processor when it and 32 bit RiscOS does arrive - I am certain they will.

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
jess Message #611, posted at 15:12, 20/1/2001, in reply to message #610
Unregistered user laptop vs omega as next purchase?
The laptop should perform much the same as a Mico or Riscstation.
(possibly better since it would be in a lower screen mode).
My brother's Mico performs quite well when compared to Windows 98, but doesn't compare to my SA-RPC.
If the Laptop were purchased as a REPLACEMENT for your current system, I think you would be dissapointed, but if it was
an aditional system, I don't think you would be.
I would assume that the Omega has a 64 bit bus because the RAM it uses is 64 bit, I would hope that the de/multiplexing
would be for the StrongArm not the X-Scale.
  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
ams Message #612, posted at 19:23, 23/1/2001, in reply to message #611
Unregistered user
I would assume that the Omega has a 64 bit bus because the RAM it uses is 64 bit, I would hope that the de/multiplexing
would be for the StrongArm not the X-Scale.


The first processors on Imago and Omega will be SA-110 (32 bits) a vacant spot will be left for the xScale. The problem is that Omega (according to pundits) has been in the works for nearly 3 years, at a time when NO ONE knew a 64bit data bus ARM was on the way. If they've had the foresight to build a 64bit bus in as the co-processor data bus then there is no problem. Millipede for their part were adapting the Imago board for xScale, but it was not yet decided (as of the Epson show) if the co-processor bus would be 32 or 64 bits wide.

Interestingly the reason the xScale has a 64 bit databus (as does the ARM10 and all ARM V5TE processors) is so that TWO Arm instructions can be fetched in one clock cycle. The ARM then performs a neat trick, if one of the instructions is a branch it can "predict" what instruction to use (the second in the load buffer) or the one to be loaded from the branch address. Fewer pipeline stalls neat !

Multiplex/DeMux is only required if the processor data bus is 32 bits wide and an ARM10/xScale is fitted (if the data bus is 64 bits wide to the daughterboard then no MUX/DEMUX is required). Although it complexifies things (for the PCB designer) a 64bit bus is the preferred option.

Otherwise the logic is that there is a MUX/DEMUX pair on both sides of the databus, the xScale "sees" a 64 bit data bus (the DEMUX/MUX pair on the Daughterboard), the memory sees a 64 bit databus (a DEMUX/MUX pair on the motherboard) but between the mux/demux pairs is a 32 bit wide channel clocked at TWICE the speed of the memory. Designing a 266MHz channel like this would be a real pain in the head but if done the processor would not see a performance hit at all and neither would the RAM. This scheme requires designing a fast bus and interface system operating at 266MHz (or above) this is not a trivial task, but it has been done before (the EV-6 bus on the Athlon runs at 200MHz).

Where this scheme falls down is (if) in 2 years time 266MHz DDR RAM is to be used as main ram it is unlikely that the MUX/DEMUX channel will cope (a future bottleneck). All in all its a scheme probably best avoided.

[Edited by ams at 19:26, 23/1/2001]

[Edited by ams at 19:31, 23/1/2001]

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
mfrissen Message #613, posted at 07:52, 24/1/2001, in reply to message #612
Unregistered user conclusion:

better get the notebook and wait how the omega turns out to be.. and if that's ok, buy it anyway (hmm, maybe win the lottery.. :-))

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 
ams Message #614, posted at 20:10, 25/1/2001, in reply to message #613
Unregistered user it may be more a case of seeing which one comes out first ;-)

I'd be in the same position myself, I would love a laptop, but an ARM7500 doesn't have the same appeal as an xScale (or even a StrongARM).

Here's a thought apparently the SA-1110 has an on chip LCD controller (but is not 26bit compatible) but is effectively a 233MHz StrongARM as well. Perhaps when ROL get the 32 bit version out that may allow RiscStation to build a really FAST portable rather than an A7000 with an LCD screen.

By the way just in case they don't - best of luck with the Lottery Marco !

  ^[ Log in to reply ]
 

The Icon Bar: General: laptop & xscale

© Copyright One Point Nought 2000 - 2024.About | Staff | Contact us | Privacy policy