| |
Links back to forum at bottom of topic page |
| |
richcheng (16:17 8/11/2005)
monkeyson2 (16:37 8/11/2005)
richcheng (17:56 8/11/2005)
rich (17:57 8/11/2005)
[mentat] (19:19 8/11/2005)
richcheng (10:03 9/11/2005)
rich (10:59 9/11/2005)
Hertzsprung (11:52 9/11/2005)
[mentat] (12:39 9/11/2005)
rich (13:44 9/11/2005)
[mentat] (12:40 9/11/2005)
[mentat] (12:42 9/11/2005)
Phlamethrower (13:20 9/11/2005)
rich (13:47 9/11/2005)
Phlamethrower (14:45 9/11/2005)
rich (16:41 9/11/2005)
Phlamethrower (17:00 9/11/2005)
andypoole (18:06 9/11/2005)
Phlamethrower (10:58 10/11/2005)
richcheng (12:05 10/11/2005)
richcheng (09:51 5/1/2006)
rich (13:45 9/11/2005)
rich (13:45 9/11/2005)
|
| |
|
richard cheng |
Message #71687, posted by richcheng at 16:17, 8/11/2005 |
Posts: 655
|
Possibly this is related to the browser I'm using (firefox), and possibly it already exists but I'm just too dumb to find it, but could a link to the forum that a topic is in be added to the bottom of the topic page.
Reason being, when I get to the end of a topic and use the browser's "back" functionality, the little envelope that indicates I've read the thread remains closed. If I want it to be opened, I have to scroll all the way back to the top of the topic and click on the link there.
For a long thread, this can be a pain.
It'd be both time-saving and also and RSI-friendly not to have to do this. |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Phil Mellor |
Message #71688, posted by monkeyson2 at 16:37, 8/11/2005, in reply to message #71687 |
 Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380
|
Sounds like a good idea. In the meantime, you could press the Home key to jump to the top of the page. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
richard cheng |
Message #71689, posted by richcheng at 17:56, 8/11/2005, in reply to message #71688 |
Posts: 655
|
That, sir, is a good suggestion, and one I shall begin to use.
So long as my other hand isn't... um... occupied.
*Ahem* |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #71690, posted by rich at 17:57, 8/11/2005, in reply to message #71688 |
 Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
Probably easier to copy the whole link generation code from the top - i.e. include the link to the list of forums as well. Some people seem to miss that link entirely.
________
 Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
I don't have tourettes you're just a cun |
Message #71691, posted by [mentat] at 19:19, 8/11/2005, in reply to message #71688 |
![[mentat]](/images/smileys/mentat.gif) Fear is the mind-killer
Posts: 6266
|
Sounds like a good idea. In the meantime, you could press the Home key to jump to the top of the page. Or how about the little white triangles that reside in the bottom right hand corner of every single post in a thread...? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
richard cheng |
Message #71737, posted by richcheng at 10:03, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71691 |
Posts: 655
|
Probably easier to copy the whole link generation code from the top - i.e. include the link to the list of forums as well. Some people seem to miss that link entirely. You seem to have developed a habit of saying exactly what it was I meant to say in the first place, Rich 
Sounds like a good idea. In the meantime, you could press the Home key to jump to the top of the page. Or how about the little white triangles that reside in the bottom right hand corner of every single post in a thread...?
The ones which, hitherto now, I'm pretty sure must have been invisible? I have never noticed those before.
An excellent solution. And which doesn't require the use of my 'spare' hand.
I still think it'd be nice to put the:
"The Icon Bar forums: Site Comments: Links back to forum at bottom of topic page"
bit at the bottom too, though. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #71738, posted by rich at 10:59, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71737 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
OK - I think I've got it. The "breadcrumbs" should be sorted, with post topic/search but without the user stuff. I also coloured in the footer to make it look better 
I also tried putting the page (number) navigation in the top as well as the bottom of the thread list.
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
James Shaw |
Message #71739, posted by Hertzsprung at 11:52, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71738 |
 Ghost-like
Posts: 1746
|
What's that stuff down there \/ \/ \/
looks a bit mad  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
I don't have tourettes you're just a cun |
Message #71741, posted by [mentat] at 12:39, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71739 |
Fear is the mind-killer
Posts: 6266
|
It's good.
But:
"Links back to forum at bottom of topic page" ..? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
I don't have tourettes you're just a cun |
Message #71742, posted by [mentat] at 12:40, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71738 |
Fear is the mind-killer
Posts: 6266
|
I also tried putting the page (number) navigation in the top as well as the bottom of the thread list. Tried out but decided not to implement? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
I don't have tourettes you're just a cun |
Message #71743, posted by [mentat] at 12:42, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71742 |
Fear is the mind-killer
Posts: 6266
|
It looks good in a topic thread, but no so good in here |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #71744, posted by Phlamethrower at 13:20, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71743 |
 Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
And what happened to the gap between the links at the top and the threaded list/forum index header? it looks a bit cramped now. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #71747, posted by rich at 13:44, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71741 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
It's good.
But:
"Links back to forum at bottom of topic page" ..? It's an exact copy of what's above (unless you're an admin ). So yes, it lets you know what thread you're in; handy for tabbed browsers.
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #71748, posted by rich at 13:45, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71742 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
I also tried putting the page (number) navigation in the top as well as the bottom of the thread list. Tried out but decided not to implement?
Sigh. Can you see it or not?
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #71749, posted by rich at 13:45, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71743 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
It looks good in a topic thread, but no so good in here Tough. It's a standard header; I can't really pick and choose.
(Well, I could, but it's hard enough just finding the right place to put stuff, never mind working out the different pages)
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #71750, posted by rich at 13:47, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71744 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
And what happened to the gap between the links at the top and the threaded list/forum index header? it looks a bit cramped now. What are you using? It looks fine to me (using Firefox). With the [p] [/p] in there, there was a huge gap - which looks even more silly with the page navigation at the top of the list of threads.
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #71754, posted by Phlamethrower at 14:45, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71750 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
What are you using? It looks fine to me (using Firefox). With the [p] [/p] in there, there was a huge gap - which looks even more silly with the page navigation at the top of the list of threads. IE 6.
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/gap.png
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/nogap.png |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Richard Goodwin |
Message #71758, posted by rich at 16:41, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71754 |
Dictator for life
Posts: 6828
|
What are you using? It looks fine to me (using Firefox). With the [p] [/p] in there, there was a huge gap - which looks even more silly with the page navigation at the top of the list of threads. IE 6.
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/gap.png
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/nogap.png
Hmm... didn't take the same page to make one look worse than the other?
I don't think it looks bad this way - there's a gap of about half a line, rather than the two or three line gap you get with the tags in and using Firefox.
________
Cheers,
Rich.
|
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #71759, posted by Phlamethrower at 17:00, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71758 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
What are you using? It looks fine to me (using Firefox). With the [p] [/p] in there, there was a huge gap - which looks even more silly with the page navigation at the top of the list of threads. IE 6.
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/gap.png
http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/nogap.png
Hmm... didn't take the same page to make one look worse than the other?
How can I take screenshots of the same page if the gap shows on some but not on others?
I don't think it looks bad this way - there's a gap of about half a line, rather than the two or three line gap you get with the tags in and using Firefox. Well, I like the gap 
Must install firefox and see what all the fuss is about. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Andrew Poole |
Message #71760, posted by andypoole at 18:06, 9/11/2005, in reply to message #71759 |
Posts: 5558
|
Must install firefox and see what all the fuss is about. *takes away  's GTA:SA until he's done this |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #71770, posted by Phlamethrower at 10:58, 10/11/2005, in reply to message #71760 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
Hmm, it does appear to be an IE problem. The gap isn't particularly large in netsurf, but it is there on every page I've checked. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
richard cheng |
Message #71771, posted by richcheng at 12:05, 10/11/2005, in reply to message #71770 |
Posts: 655
|
Hmm, it does appear to be an IE problem. The gap isn't particularly large in netsurf, but it is there on every page I've checked. IE's habit of adding random bits of white space is one of the most annoying things about it, w.r.t. web design, if you ask me.
Thank you for my breadcrumbs, Rich! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
richard cheng |
Message #73305, posted by richcheng at 09:51, 5/1/2006, in reply to message #71771 |
Posts: 655
|
The breadcrumbs.
are.
great.
Thanks! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
