Dodgy JPEGs | |
(16:36 18/7/2001) ToiletDuck (17:53 18/7/2001) senduran (18:15 18/7/2001) geoff_youngs (10:31 19/7/2001) monkeyson (17:44 20/7/2001) |
|
monkeyson | Message #5428, posted at 16:36, 18/7/2001 |
Unregistered user | I have been sent what appears to be an interlaced JPEG, but neither ChangeFSI, Fresco or FYEO2 will touch it... It's not a problem personally, because the Gimp can read it, but it's not good if RISC OS can't even handle "standards" such as JPEGs! |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Mark Quint | Message #5429, posted by ToiletDuck at 17:53, 18/7/2001, in reply to message #5428 |
Quack Quack
Posts: 1016 |
interlaced JPEG?? :/ havent heard of 'em before, & the only problem i've seen with jpegs & RiscOS are some images produced by Song Mavica digital cameras, although there was some software released that read them. |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
senduran | Message #5430, posted at 18:15, 18/7/2001, in reply to message #5428 |
Unregistered user | Mr Jake, there must be something wrong with the jpeg. Perhaps Gimp is more tolerent. I've certainly never come across a jpeg the RO browsers or CFSI couldn't handle. Mark, I think Mr Jake means progressive JPEG. |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
geoff_youngs | Message #5431, posted at 10:31, 19/7/2001, in reply to message #5428 |
Unregistered user | Try taking a slash at it using JClean - available from http://www.dacha.freeuk.com/ |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
monkeyson | Message #5432, posted at 17:44, 20/7/2001, in reply to message #5431 |
Unregistered user | Yup, it's progressive. I'll try those utilties and see what happens... Thanks for the help. |
[ Log in to reply ] | |