| |
Just some testing... |
| |
filecore (01:14 27/3/2003)
Phlamethrower (10:32 27/3/2003)
Phlamethrower (10:33 27/3/2003)
filecore (13:28 27/3/2003)
[mentat] (14:34 27/3/2003)
Phlamethrower (18:13 1/4/2003)
ksattic (21:54 7/4/2003)
ksattic (21:55 7/4/2003)
Matthew (13:48 8/4/2003)
ksattic (15:17 8/4/2003)
|
| |
|
Jason Togneri |
Message #38289, posted by filecore at 01:14, 27/3/2003 |
Posts: 3868
|
Do we have the :albino: on the forum smileys?
EDIT: We don't. Why not? It's in Playpen chat...
Also, I have tried once before using the "small" command and I forgot to close it. It showed the tag as text... here goes... test
<small>EDIT: yep, it doesn't. But why doesn't it recognise the tag and just 'small' everything that's after it, as with a <b>bold or <i>italic tag that isn't closed properly?
[Edited by filecore at 01:16, 27/3/2003]
EDIT: okay it's gone weird now... it's displaying the 'small' tag AND activating it. Is it supposed to do that? Also, I'm sure I posted something once without closing the <b> and <i> tags, and it went just like in HTML... or maybe just my bad memory... oh well.
[Edited by filecore at 01:17, 27/3/2003] |
| |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #38299, posted by Phlamethrower at 10:32, 27/3/2003, in reply to message #38289 |
 Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
/me tests < small >
<small>SMALL! |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #38301, posted by Phlamethrower at 10:33, 27/3/2003, in reply to message #38299 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
Nope, doesn't do anything here. And if you'd checked the smiley list then you would have seen that there's no :albino:, just like a few more of the playpen chat ones are missing. |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jason Togneri |
Message #38317, posted by filecore at 13:28, 27/3/2003, in reply to message #38301 |
Posts: 3868
|
if you'd checked the smiley list then you would have seen that there's no :albino: Ahhh but then again, it's been known for "certain people"  to post smileys to the forums on occasion without/before they are on the smiley lists...
Okay, I confess, before the current smiley craze started... |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
I don't have tourettes you're just a cun |
Message #38345, posted by [mentat] at 14:34, 27/3/2003, in reply to message #38317 |
![[mentat]](/images/smileys/mentat.gif) Fear is the mind-killer
Posts: 6266
|
:vibrator: |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Jeffrey Lee |
Message #39149, posted by Phlamethrower at 18:13, 1/4/2003, in reply to message #38345 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100
|
/me prods forum to fix index page |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Simon Wilson |
Message #39679, posted by ksattic at 21:54, 7/4/2003, in reply to message #39149 |
 Finally, an avatar!
Posts: 1291
|
Just testing form support in O2 as I can't post to the Aemulor forums.
Should be on a new paragraph but may not be because O2 appears to send LF terminated lines instead of CRLF (is that a standard???) |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Simon Wilson |
Message #39680, posted by ksattic at 21:55, 7/4/2003, in reply to message #39679 |
Finally, an avatar!
Posts: 1291
|
OK, that seemed fine.
I am talking to myself now...  |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Matthew Somerville |
Message #39726, posted by Matthew at 13:48, 8/4/2003, in reply to message #39679 |
Posts: 520
|
Should be on a new paragraph but may not be because O2 appears to send LF terminated lines instead of CRLF (is that a standard???) There is no standard on line ending form submission, server-side scripts must cope with every possibility. There /was/ something about standardising to CRLF in an HTML4 working draft back in September 1997, but it was gone by the recommendation in December 1997... |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
Simon Wilson |
Message #39736, posted by ksattic at 15:17, 8/4/2003, in reply to message #39726 |
Finally, an avatar!
Posts: 1291
|
There is no standard on line ending form submission, server-side scripts must cope with every possibility. I see. It seems a sensible thing to do if the internet text message (RFC822) standard uses CRLF terminated lines.
Incidentally, what are the possibilities? There's CRLF and LF, and didn't Macs use CR in the pre-OS-X days? |
| |
[ Log in to reply ] |
| |
|
