Testing HTML removal bypass | |
rich (13:34 25/2/2003) Phlamethrower (13:37 25/2/2003) rich (13:44 25/2/2003) Riker (19:16 25/2/2003) Phlamethrower (19:44 25/2/2003) moss (19:51 25/2/2003) andrew (09:39 26/2/2003) rich (09:40 26/2/2003) andrew (09:52 26/2/2003) rich (10:26 26/2/2003) andrew (11:22 26/2/2003) monkeyson2 (11:24 26/2/2003) |
|
Richard Goodwin | Message #34071, posted by rich at 13:34, 25/2/2003 |
Dictator for life Posts: 6828 |
This should be in big coughyou're going to die horriblycough ________ Cheers, Rich. |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Jeffrey Lee | Message #34073, posted by Phlamethrower at 13:37, 25/2/2003, in reply to message #34071 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100 |
|
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Richard Goodwin | Message #34080, posted by rich at 13:44, 25/2/2003, in reply to message #34073 |
Dictator for life Posts: 6828 |
I tried doing that in the 24 thread in the playpen, and I'm sure the < small > worked, but the < big > came up as text. Possibly I double-clicked the tick box or something. ________ Cheers, Rich. |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Andrew | Message #34126, posted by Riker at 19:16, 25/2/2003, in reply to message #34080 |
Member
Posts: 47 |
<big>RICHARD MADELEY IS A FLIPPANT TWIT</big>IMO <big>The BBC ARE YEAR-ZERO POLITICALLY CORRECT OBSESSED PIGMIES </BIG> IMO [Edited by Riker at 19:22, 25/2/2003] |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Jeffrey Lee | Message #34144, posted by Phlamethrower at 19:44, 25/2/2003, in reply to message #34126 |
Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot Hot stuff
Posts: 15100 |
My, Andrew certainly has his brain in today |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
John Hoare | Message #34153, posted by moss at 19:51, 25/2/2003, in reply to message #34144 |
Posts: 9348 |
|
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Andrew | Message #34213, posted by andrew at 09:39, 26/2/2003, in reply to message #34144 |
Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439 |
My, Andrew certainly has his brain in todayApart froms spelling pigmies wrong, what do you mean? |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Richard Goodwin | Message #34214, posted by rich at 09:40, 26/2/2003, in reply to message #34213 |
Dictator for life Posts: 6828 |
Perhaps that you're not an administrator, and so don't have the HTML removal bypass option available to you? Or that you're spouting gibberish in CAPITAL LETTERS AGAIN! Or that you were using a second account to duck your attractive avatarMy, Andrew certainly has his brain in todayApart froms spelling pigmies wrong, what do you mean? ________ Cheers, Rich. |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Andrew | Message #34219, posted by andrew at 09:52, 26/2/2003, in reply to message #34214 |
Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439 |
capital letters was for emphasis.Perhaps that you're not an administrator, and so don't have the HTML removal bypass option available to you? Or that you're spouting gibberish in CAPITAL LETTERS AGAIN! Or that you were using a second account to duck your attractive avatarMy, Andrew certainly has his brain in todayApart froms spelling pigmies wrong, what do you mean? |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Richard Goodwin | Message #34224, posted by rich at 10:26, 26/2/2003, in reply to message #34219 |
Dictator for life Posts: 6828 |
capital letters was for emphasis.No, because everything was in capital letters. Emphasis means you're selecting one section to highlight so that it stands out from the rest of the text. "Emphasising" the whole posting makes the emphasis meaningless, and quite annoying. And while we're in a correctional mood, it's "Capital letters were used for emphasis", or "The capitalisation was for emphasis". See how only the changes were emphasised? That's how this shit works (to quote Samuel L. Jackson). ________ Cheers, Rich. |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Andrew | Message #34246, posted by andrew at 11:22, 26/2/2003, in reply to message #34224 |
Handbag Boi
Posts: 3439 |
Well I was emphasising it in the context of the thread. Anyway the intention was to try the <big> tags and thought of something I wanted to write IN BIG! |
[ Log in to reply ] | |
Phil Mellor | Message #34248, posted by monkeyson2 at 11:24, 26/2/2003, in reply to message #34246 |
Please don't let them make me be a monkey butler
Posts: 12380 |
I could do a great joke about getting the emphasis right, but it's a verbal gag. I'll do it anyway. "Well, you've got to get the emphasis right." |
[ Log in to reply ] | |