Jan "Artex" Klose has mailed us with an intriguing proposition - become a TEK trooper!| Time to enlist! | |
| This is a long thread. Click here to view the threaded list. | |
| Hyacinth bouqet | Message #87259, posted at 10:17, 18/3/2002 |
| Unregistered user | but the release date is still 15th April right? |
 [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Rich | Message #87260, posted at 10:40, 18/3/2002, in reply to message #87259 |
| Unregistered user | I believe so David, yes. |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Oovarvu Reeves | Message #87261, posted at 18:59, 18/3/2002, in reply to message #87260 |
| Unregistered user | Why thank you Susan. |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Jeffrey Lee | Message #87262, posted at 19:34, 18/3/2002, in reply to message #87261 |
| Unregistered user | *confused* |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Tim Fountain | Message #87263, posted at 21:37, 18/3/2002, in reply to message #87262 |
| Unregistered user | If I counted right we've had 13 responses so far, so there're still a few troopers left to be named. |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| A.Weston | Message #87264, posted at 09:48, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87263 |
| Unregistered user | What have people chosen? I've given two alternatives in the event that somebody has chosen the same ;-) |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Morimer Braithwaite | Message #87265, posted at 09:49, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87264 |
| Unregistered user | Hi Jeffrey! |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Rich Goodwin | Message #87266, posted at 10:10, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87265 |
| Unregistered user | Goodbye, person who uses "amusing" names. |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Anonymous | Message #87267, posted at 10:31, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87266 |
| Unregistered user | At least they're not meant to be offensive. Gerhaard |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Steve Allen | Message #87268, posted at 10:55, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87267 |
| Unregistered user | Nice rip off of what Konami did with MGS2 ;) Cept there are 342 names in that! I like it, tho I dont want to kill myself :( |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Simon Challands | Message #87269, posted at 12:14, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87268 |
| Unregistered user | Are we going to see a PaulM as Cheif Piece of Cannon Fodder? I sometimes feel that it would allow a lot of people to vent a lot of frustration... |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Guest | Message #87270, posted at 13:20, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87269 |
| Unregistered user | Someone sent in Paul THE Vigay's name? |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Rich Goodwin | Message #87271, posted at 13:22, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87270 |
| Unregistered user | Yes, I told Paul about this as soon as the posting went up. I'm hoping we can have a "most interesting way for killing Paul" screenshot compo later on - depends if TEK can display the name on screen or not.. :) |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Andrew Weston | Message #87272, posted at 15:03, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87271 |
| Unregistered user | I thought it was 6 letters we had to send? |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Rich Goodwin | Message #87273, posted at 15:03, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87272 |
| Unregistered user | Less than six actually, but hey, what the heck, if everyone sends in exactly six that's fine :) |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Rich Goodwin | Message #87274, posted at 15:16, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87273 |
| Unregistered user | if ((length($name) <= 6) && (length($name) > 0)) then { print "OK\n"; } else { print "Bad length\n"; } |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Andrew Weston | Message #87275, posted at 16:39, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87274 |
| Unregistered user | Crappy C! |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Rich Goodwin | Message #87276, posted at 16:40, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87275 |
| Unregistered user | Good, 'cos it's Perl :) |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Guest | Message #87277, posted at 16:49, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87276 |
| Unregistered user | "the name is limited to 6 characters max" so how can that be less than six, Rich? :-p |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Rich Goodwin | Message #87278, posted at 18:20, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87277 |
| Unregistered user | Note the inclusion of the "max" part. There is a limitation - that limitation is that the /maximum/ number of characters is six. It can be less than six, but the max is six, and that's the limitation.* I've written it in modern English. I've written it in Perl. I've now written it in old-school English. How can I make that any clearer? *(with apologies to MoJo JoJo) |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Rich Goodwin | Message #87279, posted at 18:26, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87278 |
| Unregistered user | Besides which, I've already seen at least one seven emailed in, and someone else complained that they couldn't see an email address anywhere... |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Guest | Message #87280, posted at 18:49, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87279 |
| Unregistered user | Perl was it? |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Guest | Message #87281, posted at 18:50, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87280 |
| Unregistered user | I also noted the inclusion of 'less than six actually'. Really, Rich! |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| John Hoare | Message #87282, posted at 19:38, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87281 |
| Unregistered user | You're a *bad* *monkey* Richard Goodwin... and I'm coming to kick some Powerpuff hiney!!! |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Mark Quint | Message #87283, posted at 22:50, 19/3/2002, in reply to message #87282 |
| Unregistered user | how do we know if we have 'won' with our names? :) |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Andrew Weston | Message #87284, posted at 10:12, 20/3/2002, in reply to message #87283 |
| Unregistered user | Rich - which is corrrect: I'll give it it's dinner or I'll give it its dinner ? >:-> |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Guest | Message #87285, posted at 11:31, 20/3/2002, in reply to message #87284 |
| Unregistered user | Rich - the PERL is bad as well - you don't have 'then' after an if; just the "{" ;-) (Jason Tribbeck - who can't remember his password atm) |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Anonymous | Message #87286, posted at 13:55, 20/3/2002, in reply to message #87285 |
| Unregistered user | It's its, it's beiing short for it is (usually) |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Andrew Weston | Message #87287, posted at 14:11, 20/3/2002, in reply to message #87286 |
| Unregistered user | Damn, I meant to sign Anonymous as Rich. Damn this new code! |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Guest | Message #87288, posted at 15:40, 20/3/2002, in reply to message #87287 |
| Unregistered user | I think that it's "it's", because the dinner belongs to it. "Steve's dinner" springs to mind. |
| [ Log in to reply ] |
|
| Pages (2): 1 > >| | |
